The VEFP showed no statistically significant effect on the NGRT secondary outcomes of sentence completion or passage comprehension¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The sentence completion subscale showed no significant effect (Hedges' g = 0.02, p=0.804). → Styles 2014 q3 i? The passage comprehension subscale showed no significant effect (Hedges' g = 0.07, p=0.281). → Styles 2014 (2)

Evidence¶

Styles 2014¶

Styles, B., Stevens, E., Bradshaw, S., & Clarkson, R. (2014). Vocabulary Enrichment Intervention Programme Evaluation Report and Executive Summary. Education Endowment Foundation. http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN67513320/

q3 · i? · causal · r3

Secondary outcome analysis in the intention-to-treat regression on 282 intervention and 288 control pupils. The printed row reports "Sentence completion score 0.02" with 95% CI -0.12 to 0.16 and p=0.804, not significant.

"Secondary Sentence completion score 0.02 -0.12 0.16 0.804 282 288"

Styles 2014 (2)¶

Styles, B., Stevens, E., Bradshaw, S., & Clarkson, R. (2014). Vocabulary Enrichment Intervention Programme Evaluation Report and Executive Summary. Education Endowment Foundation. http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN67513320/

q3 · i? · causal · r3

Secondary outcome analysis in the same intention-to-treat model. The printed row reports "Passion comprehension score 0.07" — as printed, passage comprehension — with 95% CI -0.05 to 0.19 and p=0.281, not significant.

"Secondary Passage comprehension score 0.07 -0.05 0.19 0.281 282 288"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The Vocabulary Enrichment Full Programme showed no statistically significant impact on Year 7 pupils' reading ability in a pupil-randomised controlled trial — a broader claim this one bears on
• The VEFP showed no statistically significant impact on reading for pupils eligible for free school meals — related