Claims

The experimental group showed a statistically significant vocabulary gain from pretest to posttest under the flash card treatment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's pretest-to-posttest improvement was statistically significant (paired t = 18.751 vs critical 2.064). → Komachali and Khodareza 2012

Evidence

Komachali and Khodareza 2012

Maryam Eslahcar Komachali, Mohammadreza Khodareza. (2012). The Effect of Using Vocabulary Flash Card on Iranian Pre-University Students' Vocabulary Knowledge. International Education Studies, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n3p134

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired-samples t-test of the experimental group's (n = 25) pretest and posttest vocabulary scores after the VFC treatment; the article reports observed t 18.751 greater than critical 2.064, a "significant difference between the means of the two sets of scores". Descriptively, posttest mean 16.72 exceeded pretest mean 14.28. No effect size is printed.

"It is clear from Table 5.1 the observed t is 18.751 which was greater than the critical value 2.064, thus it was concluded that there is a significant difference between the means of the two sets of scores."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.