Claims

The share of students choosing interleaved practice rose from 13% to 40% across the session, but the visual feedback prompt did not further increase interleaved practice choices

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Strategy decisions to use interleaved practice significantly increased over time, from 13% before study to 40% at final choice. → Onan 2022 q3 i? The number of interleaved-practice choices did not significantly differ between the VFP and control group. → Onan 2022 (2)

Evidence

Onan 2022

Onan, E., Wiradhany, W., Biwer, F., Janssen, E. M., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2022). Growing Out of the Experience: How Subjective Experiences of Effort and Learning Influence the Use of Interleaved Practice. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09692-3

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Binary strategy choices at three time points: 13% reported habitual interleaved use before study, 34% after study phase I, and 40% chose interleaved practice for novel materials. The Cochran's Q test was significant, χ2(2) = 43.531, p < 0.001; no effect size was printed.

"A Cochran's Q test further revealed that strategy decisions to use interleaved practice significantly increased over time, χ2(2) = 43.531, p < 0.001."

Onan 2022 (2)

Onan, E., Wiradhany, W., Biwer, F., Janssen, E. M., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2022). Growing Out of the Experience: How Subjective Experiences of Effort and Learning Influence the Use of Interleaved Practice. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09692-3

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Half of participants (N = 74) received the visual feedback prompt before the final choice. The chi-square test showed no significant difference between groups, χ2(1) = 2.151, p = 0.142; equivalence was not tested and no effect size was printed.

"A chi-square test of independence further indicated that the number of choices for interleaved practice did not significantly differ between the VFP and control group, χ2(1) = 2.151, p = 0.142."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id vfp-did-not-improve-strategy-choices
title The share of students choosing interleaved practice rose from 13% to 40% across the session, but the visual feedback prompt did not further increase interleaved practice choices
description The share of students choosing interleaved practice rose from 13% to 40% across the session, but the visual feedback prompt did not further increase interleaved practice choices
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — onan-2022, onan-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.