The share of students choosing interleaved practice rose from 13% to 40% across the session, but the visual feedback prompt did not further increase interleaved practice choices¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Strategy decisions to use interleaved practice significantly increased over time, from 13% before study to 40% at final choice. → Onan 2022
q3 i? The number of interleaved-practice choices did not significantly differ between the VFP and control group. → Onan 2022 (2)
Evidence¶
Onan 2022¶
Onan, E., Wiradhany, W., Biwer, F., Janssen, E. M., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2022). Growing Out of the Experience: How Subjective Experiences of Effort and Learning Influence the Use of Interleaved Practice. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09692-3
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Binary strategy choices at three time points: 13% reported habitual interleaved use before study, 34% after study phase I, and 40% chose interleaved practice for novel materials. The Cochran's Q test was significant, χ2(2) = 43.531, p < 0.001; no effect size was printed.
"A Cochran's Q test further revealed that strategy decisions to use interleaved practice significantly increased over time, χ2(2) = 43.531, p < 0.001."
Onan 2022 (2)¶
Onan, E., Wiradhany, W., Biwer, F., Janssen, E. M., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2022). Growing Out of the Experience: How Subjective Experiences of Effort and Learning Influence the Use of Interleaved Practice. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09692-3
q3 · i? · causal · r?
Half of participants (N = 74) received the visual feedback prompt before the final choice. The chi-square test showed no significant difference between groups, χ2(1) = 2.151, p = 0.142; equivalence was not tested and no effect size was printed.
"A chi-square test of independence further indicated that the number of choices for interleaved practice did not significantly differ between the VFP and control group, χ2(1) = 2.151, p = 0.142."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Strategy efficacy beliefs shift toward the strategy a student chooses: choosers of blocked practice raised blocked beliefs and lowered interleaved beliefs, and vice versa — related
- Temporal increase in perceived learning fully mediates the effect of temporal decrease in perceived effort on choosing interleaved practice — related
- Qualitative findings: students initially held inaccurate beliefs about strategy efficacy, and high effort from interleaved practice was misinterpreted as a sign of poor learning — related
- Perceived learning is higher for blocked than interleaved practice at onset but increases over time for interleaved practice only — related
- Perceived effort is higher and perceived learning lower for interleaving than blocking, and experience-mediated increases in perceived learning raise interleaving choices — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
vfp-did-not-improve-strategy-choices |
title |
The share of students choosing interleaved practice rose from 13% to 40% across the session, but the visual feedback prompt did not further increase interleaved practice choices |
description |
The share of students choosing interleaved practice rose from 13% to 40% across the session, but the visual feedback prompt did not further increase interleaved practice choices |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — onan-2022, onan-2022-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.