Vigorous physical activity significantly predicts originality, fluency and flexibility in regression models, but not elaboration¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Vigorous physical activity significantly accounted for 6.1% of variance of originality (F (1, 136) = 8.888, p = 0.003) and 6.4% of variance of flexibility (F (1, 136) = 9.254, p = 0.003). → Romance 2023
q2 i0 The relationship between the elaboration variable and vigorous physical activity was not significant (Table 4: ELA R2 = 0.006, p = 0.376). → Romance 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Romance 2023¶
Romance, R., Nielsen-Rodríguez, A., Sousa Mendes, R., Dobado-Castañeda, J. C., & Dias, G. (2023). The influence of physical activity on the creativity of 10 and 11-year-old school children. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101295
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Multiple regression analysis for vigorous physical activity predicting components of divergent thinking (Table 4). The same table reports FLE variance of 6.4% (F (1, 136) = 9.254, p = 0.003) and FLU variance of 4.4% (p = 0.013); R² figures are not standardised effect sizes.
"Regarding the variable O, the vigorous physical activity predictor (B = 0.680, B SE = 0.228, β = 0.248, t = 2.981, CI [0.229, 1.131]) significantly accounted for 6.1% (95% CI for R2; adjusted R2 = 0.054) of variance of 0, F (1, 136) = 8.888, p = 0.003."
Romance 2023 (2)¶
Romance, R., Nielsen-Rodríguez, A., Sousa Mendes, R., Dobado-Castañeda, J. C., & Dias, G. (2023). The influence of physical activity on the creativity of 10 and 11-year-old school children. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101295
q2 · i0 · associational · r2
Null regression result from Table 4 of the same analysis: elaboration showed R2 = 0.006 (adjusted R2 = -0.002, t = 0.887, p = 0.376) with vigorous physical activity. A non-significant test with a printed near-zero R² is coded as a negligible association.
"However, the relationship between the ELA variable and vigorous physical activity was not significant."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Creativity — outcome: instruction changes it
- Physical Well-Being — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Light and moderate physical activity and sedentary behavior show no significant relationship with any creativity component or overall creativity — reports the opposite
- Vigorous physical activity is positively and significantly correlated with fluency, originality, flexibility and overall creativity in 10–11-year-old children — a broader claim this one bears on
- In a multiple regression model, vigorous physical activity significantly accounts for 4.5% of variance in overall creativity — related
- Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity correlates positively with fluency, originality, flexibility and overall creativity, though less significantly than vigorous activity alone — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
vigorous-activity-predicts-o-flu-fle-not-ela |
title |
Vigorous physical activity significantly predicts originality, fluency and flexibility in regression models, but not elaboration |
description |
Vigorous physical activity significantly predicts originality, fluency and flexibility in regression models, but not elaboration |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — romance-2023, romance-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.