Claims

First-year nursing students taught with virtual simulation and interactive multimedia scored higher on the theoretical exam than the traditionally taught group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the theoretical exam, the mean score in the virtual teaching group was higher than in the traditional group (P<0.001). → Mosalanejad 2012

Evidence

Mosalanejad 2012

Mosalanejad, L.; Shahsavari, S.; Sobhanian, S.; & Dastpak, M. (2012). The effect of virtual versus traditional learning in achieving competency-based skills. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(2). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental comparison of 43 freshman nursing students in a virtual learning program with a matched group of 43 sophomores taught conventionally, same content, instructor and final evaluation. Table 1 reports theory means of 13.83±1.67 (virtual) versus 12.43±2.02 (traditional), P=0.001, described as "higher mean scores".

"A significant difference in theoretical scores of the two groups was found; students who were taught by interactive multimedia and virtual simulation had higher mean scores in comparison with traditional teaching group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.