Claims

Vision-span expansion training has no negative effect on reading comprehension scores of either group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Neither the test group (Z = -.388, p = .698) nor the control group (Z = -.677, p = .499) showed a significant change in comprehension from pre- to post-test. → Kana'an et al. 2014

Evidence

Kana'an et al. 2014

Basim Hamdan Ibrahim Kana'an, Salahud Din Abdul Rab & Ahlullah Siddiqui. (2014). The Effect of Expansion of Vision Span on Reading Speed: A Case Study of EFL Major Students at King Khalid University. English Language Teaching, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n10p57

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Wilcoxon signed-rank tests on comprehension scores (out of 10) for both groups in Tables 3 and 4: control Z = -.677, p = .499; test Z = -.388, p = .698. The article reports "both groups maintained the same level of comprehension in both tests"; no effect size is printed.

"Thus, the results indicate that both groups maintained the same level of comprehension in both tests, which affirms the researchers’ hypotheses 3 and 4, which state that the reading comprehension score of both the control and test groups in post-test is very similar to that in the pre-test."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.