Claims

Learning from visual displays often yields disappointing outcomes because displays pose substantial demands on learners

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Visual displays have great potential to foster learning, but they also pose substantial demands on learners so that actual learning outcomes are often disappointing. → Renkl 2017

Evidence

Renkl 2017

Renkl, A., & Scheiter, K. (2017). Studying Visual Displays: How to Instructionally Support Learning. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9340-4

q2 · i? · review · r?

The review's framing statement, based on its synthesis of the literature on learning from visual displays: displays "pose substantial demands on learners" and "the actual learning outcomes are often disappointing." No effect size is printed for this overall assessment.

"Although visual displays have great potential to foster learning, they also pose substantial demands on learners so that the actual learning outcomes are often disappointing."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id visual-displays-pose-demands-disappointing-outcomes
title Learning from visual displays often yields disappointing outcomes because displays pose substantial demands on learners
description Learning from visual displays often yields disappointing outcomes because displays pose substantial demands on learners
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — renkl-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.