Visual media assessments (posters, presentations) were not passable because ChatGPT could not produce complete slides or poster content¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Assignments requiring visual media output failed the pass criteria, though the text content generated was sufficient for a student to copy into slides. → Ivory 2026
Evidence¶
Ivory 2026¶
Ivory, M., Finnerty, S., Dunn, K., Philpot, R., & Warmelink, L. (2026). The Integrity of Psychology Assessments in the AI Age: A Critical Examination. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-026-09729-0
q2 · i? · design · r2
Within the case study, poster and presentation assessments could not pass because the model did not generate the slides needed; the authors note the offered content was sufficient for a student to copy and paste into slides, and that newer tools can generate downloadable files.
"For assignments that required visual media output, such as posters and presentation slides, the Gen-AI was incapable of producing sufficient content as the model could not produce complete presentation slides nor poster content."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- AI severs the correlation between artefact quality and cognitive engagement, breaking the artefact-as-proxy for learning — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Assessments requiring novelty and originality were more resilient to AI-generated output — related
- ChatGPT produced submissions judged of passing quality for 36 of 40 undergraduate psychology assessments (90%) — related
- AI pilots found models not yet capable of high-quality math output generation, including multiple choice problems, coherent word problems, and math visuals — related
- ChatGPT produced executed, grader-accepted submissions for all three fixed personalized Qiskit assignment instances in 150 of 150 sessions — related
- Advanced prompting improved the pass rate of AI-generated psychology submissions within a one-hour limit — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
visual-media-assessments-not-passable-by-chatgpt |
title |
Visual media assessments (posters, presentations) were not passable because ChatGPT could not produce complete slides or poster content |
description |
Visual media assessments (posters, presentations) were not passable because ChatGPT could not produce complete slides or poster content |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ivory-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.