Claims

Accompanying sentences with an image improves comprehension accuracy, significantly so for sentences containing low-frequency words

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3 · i2–i3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Sentences with an image had higher comprehension accuracy than sentences without an image. → Miriam Rivero-Contreras 2023 q3 i3 The image benefit on accuracy was significant for low-frequency words but not for high-frequency words. → Miriam Rivero-Contreras 2023 (2)

Evidence

Miriam Rivero-Contreras 2023

Miriam Rivero-Contreras, Paul E. Engelhardt, David Saldaña. (2023). Do easy-to-read adaptations really facilitate sentence processing for adults with a lower level of education? An experimental eye-tracking study. Learning and Instruction 84 (2023) 101731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101731

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Nonparametric analysis of comprehension accuracy (Wilcoxon/Mann-Whitney) in the sentence processing task with 60 Spanish adults; Picture main effect r = 0.29, p = .023; Group r = 0.54. "Sentences with an image had higher accuracy than sentences without an image."

"Sentences with an image had higher accuracy than sentences without an image, and the university group had greater precision compared to the non-university group."

Miriam Rivero-Contreras 2023 (2)

Miriam Rivero-Contreras, Paul E. Engelhardt, David Saldaña. (2023). Do easy-to-read adaptations really facilitate sentence processing for adults with a lower level of education? An experimental eye-tracking study. Learning and Instruction 84 (2023) 101731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101731

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Wilcoxon paired comparisons of the Frequency × Picture interaction on accuracy; the low-frequency contrast gave r = 0.39 (p = .003), the high-frequency contrast was not significant. "the comparison of image present vs. image absent was significant for low- frequency words"

"But the comparison of image present vs. image absent was significant for low- frequency words, although not for high-frequency words"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id visual-support-improves-sentence-comprehension-accuracy
title Accompanying sentences with an image improves comprehension accuracy, significantly so for sentences containing low-frequency words
description Accompanying sentences with an image improves comprehension accuracy, significantly so for sentences containing low-frequency words
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — miriam-rivero-contreras-2023, miriam-rivero-contreras-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.