Visualization support at the planning phase helped collaborating groups report more effective planning and teamwork strategies than groups without it¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Groups receiving visualization support at the planning phase reported effectiveness in planning and teamwork strategies and were more successful in their strategy than groups without visualization support. → Järvelä 2019

Evidence¶

Järvelä 2019¶

Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Malmberg, J. (2019). Capturing the dynamic and cyclical nature of regulation: Methodological Progress in understanding socially shared regulation in learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09313-2

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative review attributing to Hadwin et al. (2018) a comparison of collaborating groups with versus without planning-phase visualization support. The review reports greater reported effectiveness for the supported groups and no effect size, so impact is null.

"The groups who received visualization support at the planning phase reported effectiveness in terms of planning and teamwork strategies, and these groups were more successful in their strategy than groups without visualization support."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Awareness visualizations of shared task perception improved reported strategy success and equalized expected effectiveness of planning and teamwork strategies — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• Awareness of heterogeneous problem perceptions does not by itself predict successful regulation — related
• Homogeneous problem perceptions predict better regulation outcomes in collaborative groups — related