Claims

Attitudes toward mathematics did not differ significantly between the VM-enriched ePBL group and the traditional PBL group after the intervention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-intervention attitude scale scores showed no statistically significant difference between the EG and CG (t(58)=1.70, p=.093). → Çakıroğlu 2014

Evidence

Çakıroğlu 2014

Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2014). Enriching project-based learning environments with virtual manipulatives: A comparative study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 201-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.55.12

q2 · i? · causal · r2

In the quasi-experimental comparison, the Mathematics Attitude Questionnaire (38 items, five-point Likert) was administered before and after the six-week project period. The independent t-test on post-attitude scores found no significant difference between groups; Table 5 reports t(58)=1.70, p=.093.

"Also, after the intervention, no significant difference occurred among the EG and the CG [ t(58) = 1.70, p <.05]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.