Claims

Teachers in VCM video-and-task interventions showed higher post-assessment growth in describing students' mathematical arguments than comparison teachers (growth rates 17% to 52% vs. 4%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Experimental subgroups exceeded the comparison group in growth rate on a video-based assessment of recognizing children's reasoning, with significance levels from 0.05 to less than 0.0001. → Maher 2014

Evidence

Maher 2014

Maher, C. A., Palius, M. F., Maher, J. A., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Sigley, R. (2014). Teachers Can Learn to Attend to Students' Reasoning Using Videos as a Tool. Issues in Teacher Education, 23(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1045688

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental study of 177 pre- and in-service teachers (127 experimental, 50 comparison) scored blindly on a video-based pre/post assessment. Logistic regression found each experimental subgroup exceeded comparison: "the growth rate of each of the experimental subgroups exceeded that of the comparison group".

"The analysis indicated that the data provided evidence that the growth rate of each of the experimental subgroups exceeded that of the comparison group at a significance level that varied from 0.05 to less than 0.0001."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.