Teachers in VCM video-and-task interventions showed higher post-assessment growth in describing students' mathematical arguments than comparison teachers (growth rates 17% to 52% vs. 4%)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Experimental subgroups exceeded the comparison group in growth rate on a video-based assessment of recognizing children's reasoning, with significance levels from 0.05 to less than 0.0001. → Maher 2014
Evidence¶
Maher 2014¶
Maher, C. A., Palius, M. F., Maher, J. A., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Sigley, R. (2014). Teachers Can Learn to Attend to Students' Reasoning Using Videos as a Tool. Issues in Teacher Education, 23(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1045688
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Quasi-experimental study of 177 pre- and in-service teachers (127 experimental, 50 comparison) scored blindly on a video-based pre/post assessment. Logistic regression found each experimental subgroup exceeded comparison: "the growth rate of each of the experimental subgroups exceeded that of the comparison group".
"The analysis indicated that the data provided evidence that the growth rate of each of the experimental subgroups exceeded that of the comparison group at a significance level that varied from 0.05 to less than 0.0001."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Case Argument 1 was the leading contributor to experimental teachers' assessment growth, accounting for at least 70% of the overall growth rate in each experimental subgroup — related
- In-service teachers consistently showed the highest growth in recognizing student reasoning, which the authors attribute to an intervention model including classroom-based task implementation — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Experimental and comparison teacher groups were comparable at pre-assessment, with no significant differences in complete argument description rates — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.