Claims

Correct word inference in reading requires knowing roughly 95-98% of surrounding words, corresponding to about 3,000-5,000 word families

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2020: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Learners need knowledge of about 95% of words in a text for general comprehension and 98% for full comprehension, requiring roughly 3,000 and 5,000 word families respectively. → Restrepo Ramos 2015

Evidence

Restrepo Ramos 2015

Restrepo Ramos, F. D. (2015). Incidental vocabulary learning in second language acquisition: A literature review. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 17(1), 157-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n1.43957

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, citing Huckin and Coady (1999), that learners must recognize a great percentage of surrounding words to guess meaning, with "95% of knowledge of the words in a text to attain general comprehension, and 98%" for full comprehension.

"this value is nearby 95% of knowledge of the words in a text to attain general comprehension, and 98% if the goal is to achieve full comprehension. The former requires the level of comprehension of 3,000 word families"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id vocabulary-coverage-thresholds-for-inference
title Correct word inference in reading requires knowing roughly 95-98% of surrounding words, corresponding to about 3,000-5,000 word families
description Correct word inference in reading requires knowing roughly 95-98% of surrounding words, corresponding to about 3,000-5,000 word families
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
source_checked 2026-10-20
recheck_by 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — restrepo-ramos-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.