Virtual patient simulations are at least as effective as traditional education for knowledge outcomes (pooled SMD=0.11)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Pooled analysis of randomized trials comparing virtual patients with traditional education shows no clear knowledge advantage (SMD=0.11, 95% CI −0.17 to 0.39). → Kononowicz AA 2019
Evidence¶
Kononowicz AA 2019¶
Kononowicz AA, Woodham LA, Edelbring S, Stathakarou N, Davies D, Saxena N, Tudor Car L, Carlstedt-Duke J, Car J, Zary N. (2019). Virtual Patient Simulations in Health Professions Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/14676
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Random-effects meta-analysis of trials comparing virtual patients with traditional education for knowledge outcomes; the pooled SMD=0.11 with CI crossing zero suggests "virtual patient interventions are as efficient as traditional education". High heterogeneity (I2=74%).
"The pooled effect for knowledge outcomes (SMD=0.11, 95% CI −0.17 to 0.39, I2=74%, n=927; Figure 2) suggests that virtual patient interventions are as efficient as traditional education."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Virtual patients are as effective as traditional education for knowledge outcomes (pooled SMD=0.11)
- Virtual patients show larger advantages over passive traditional learning (lectures, reading) than over active learning
- Attitude and satisfaction outcomes were mostly measured by item-by-item survey comparisons and showed generally positive but mixed results
- Virtual patients blended with traditional education improve knowledge more than traditional education alone (pooled SMD=0.73)
- In the few trials comparing them, virtual patients showed no significant knowledge differences versus other digital education, and skills differences in only one of three studies
- Virtual patients more effectively improve skills than traditional education (pooled SMD=0.90) — related
- Blended teaching shows no significant difference in multiple-choice question scores compared to traditional teaching — related
- Virtual simulations and mannequins or real persons show no significant difference in improving knowledge in medical and nursing education — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.