Claims

VR instruction raises nursing students' academic satisfaction more than control teaching modalities (SMD = 1.14)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Meta-analysis of four RCTs found a significant difference in learning satisfaction favouring VR over the control teaching modality (SMD = 1.14, 95% CI [0.85, 1.43], P < 0.001). → Liu Kai 2023

Evidence

Liu Kai 2023

Liu Kai, Zhang Weiwei, Li Wei, Wang Ting, Zheng Yanxue. (2023). Effectiveness of virtual reality in nursing education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04662-x

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Fixed-effects meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials measuring learning satisfaction; heterogeneity was low (P = 0.36, I2 = 7%). The pooled "SMD = 1.14" favoured VR over the control teaching modality.

"The combined results showed a significant difference in the improvement of satisfaction with nursing education with VR technology compared to the control teaching modality (SMD = 1.14, 95% CI [0.85, 1.43], P < 0.001, Fig. 7)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.