Claims

VR simulator training improves overall pedicle screw placement success relative to traditional training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Overall procedural success was significantly higher in the VR-trained group (RR 1.17), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 83%) and very low GRADE certainty. → Pasqualotto Eric 2026

Evidence

Pasqualotto Eric 2026

Pasqualotto Eric, Pasqualotto Tales, Lopes Victor Hugo Pinheiro, Lunelli Laura, Santos Lucas Loiola. (2026). Virtual reality surgical simulator training of residents and early-career surgeons for pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-026-05008-1

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Random-effects meta-analysis of six RCTs on overall screw placement success printed "RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.32; p < 0.01; I2 = 83%". A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis showed stability without major changes in significance.

"VR-trained residents and early-career surgeons also demonstrated a higher overall success rate (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.32; p < 0.01; I2 = 83%; Fig. 3A)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.