Claims

Virtual simulations are less effective than mannequins or real persons for procedural skills among nursing participants

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 In the discipline subgroup analysis, only the nursing group showed a significant difference, with VSs less effective than mannequins or RPs for procedural skills (SMD=–0.55). → Jiang N 2024

Evidence

Jiang N 2024

Jiang N, Zhang Y, Liang S, Lyu X, Chen S, Huang X, Pan H. (2024). Effectiveness of Virtual Simulations Versus Mannequins and Real Persons in Medical and Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/56195

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r3

Subgroup analysis by discipline within the procedural-skills meta-analysis of 10 RCTs: 7 medicine studies and 3 nursing studies. The nursing subgroup favored mannequins or RPs (SMD=–0.55; 95% CI –1.07 to –0.03; P=.04); the medicine subgroup showed no significant difference. Subgroup difference was not significant at P=.07.

"Only the nursing group showed a significant difference between VSs and mannequins or RPs (SMD=0.06; 95% CI –0.33 to 0.46; I2=64%; P<.001 for medicine and SMD=–0.55; 95% CI –1.07 to –0.03, I2=69%; P=.04 for nursing)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.