Claims

Initial pooled analysis shows no statistically significant difference between VSAQ and MCQ scores but with extreme heterogeneity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The initial pooled analysis of six cohorts found no statistically significant difference in student performance between VSAQs and MCQs (SMD = -0.52), with extreme heterogeneity (I2 = 98%). → Sher Ali 2026

Evidence

Sher Ali 2026

Sher Ali, Arshad Muhammad Moin Ud Din, Abbas Mesum, Asghar Abdul Hannan, Khan Anees Hussain, Ali Junaid, Yaqoob Muhammad Ibrahim, Alam Rana Aftab, Akram Muhammad Bilal, Masood Muhammad Abdullah, Thakur Amit Kumar. (2026). Very short answer questions vs. multiple choice questions in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09359-5

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of six cohorts from three studies (Total No = 1,191) pooling standardized mean differences with a random-effects model. The pooled SMD was -0.52 with a 95% CI of [-1.34, 0.30] and "extreme heterogeneity (I2 = 98%)".

"The initial pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in students’ performance between VSAQ and MCQ scores (SMD = -0.52; 95% CI [-1.34, 0.30]; p = 0.22). However, this analysis suffered from extreme heterogeneity (I2 = 98%, p < 0.00001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.