Claims

A wage bonus incentive raised hand compositors' output by sixty-seven per cent

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1922 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Motivation in the form of a wage bonus increased hand compositors' output by sixty-seven per cent. → Gates 1922

Evidence

Gates 1922

Gates, Arthur I. (1922). Educational psychology at the Princeton meeting of the American Psychological Association. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Educational_Psychology

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Conference report of H. D. Kitson's industrial study of hand compositors; the printed sixty-seven per cent output increase is reported as printed, with no standardized effect size or test statistic given.

"The effect of motivation in the form of a wage bonus on the improvement of abilities among hand compositors as reported by H. D. Kitson, Indiana University, was an increase in output of sixty-seven per cent."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id wage-bonus-compositor-output-increase
title A wage bonus incentive raised hand compositors' output by sixty-seven per cent
description A wage bonus incentive raised hand compositors' output by sixty-seven per cent
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1922
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — gates-1922

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.