Claims

Preposition accuracy gains from written corrective feedback are retained two weeks after treatment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 On the delayed post-test two weeks after treatment, the experimental group retained and slightly increased its improvement while the control group remained nearly unchanged, with a large effect size (d = 4.62). → Ahmed Ali Saleh Al Ajmi 2015

Evidence

Ahmed Ali Saleh Al Ajmi 2015

Ahmed Ali Saleh Al Ajmi. (2015). The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on Omani Students’ Accuracy in the Use of English Prepositions. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.61

q2 · i3 · causal · r1

Independent samples t-test on the delayed post-test, administered unannounced two weeks after treatment. Experimental group M = 8.08 (SD = 1.75) versus control M = 1.48 (SD = 1.08); "the effect size was large (d= 4.62)".

"The scores for the delayed post-test also showed a significant difference in the experimental group scores as they remained higher, with a slight increase, than the immediate post-test scores (M =8.08, SD =1.75) while the control group’s scores showed no noticeable increase (M=1.48, SD=1.08), t(48)=16.001, p=.000, two-tailed), and the effect size was large (d= 4.62)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.