Claims

Group membership showed weak negative Pearson correlations with knowledge score and perceived interest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pearson correlations between group membership (experimental=1, comparison=2) and the dependent variables were weakly negative: r = -.25 for knowledge test score and r = -.21 for perceived interest. → Slussareff 2016

Evidence

Slussareff 2016

Slussareff, M. and Boháčková, P. (2016). Students as Game Designers vs. 'Just' Players: Comparison of Two Different Approaches to Location-Based Games Implementation into School Curricula. Digital Education Review, 29, 284-297. http://greav.ub.edu/der

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Correlational analysis preceding the ANOVAs in the same quasi-experiment. The article reports "Weak negative correlations" with r = -.25 for knowledge test score and r = -.21 for subjectively apperceived interest; per-question coefficients ranged from negligible to strong negative relationships.

"Weak negative correlations (experimental group labelled as 1 and comparison group labelled as 2) were found with Pearson coefficients (r) -.25 (for knowledge test score) and -.21 (for the subjectively apperceived interest), p < .00."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.