Weekly average sleep measures show no association with working memory performance in older adolescents¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? No weekly sleep parameter (rest time, sleep time, efficiency, WASO, or variability) was associated with n-back response times or accuracies at p < 0.05. → Stefansdottir 2020
Evidence¶
Stefansdottir 2020¶
Stefansdottir, R., Gundersen, H., Rognvaldsdottir, V., Lundervold, A. S., Gestsdottir, S., Gudmundsdottir, S. L., Chen, K. Y., Brychta, R. J. & Johannsson, E. (2020). Association between free-living sleep and memory and attention in healthy adolescents. Scientific Reports 10:16877. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73774-x
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Null result from the same linear regression models in 160 adolescents; the authors suggest a floor effect, since "over 88% averaged less than the recommended 8 h time-in-bed over the week", and compensatory night-to-night variation may have obscured associations.
"Next, we examined the association between working memory and weekly averages of sleep parameters and found no associations with p values below 0.05 (Table 4)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Sleep the night before cognitive testing resembles weekly averages except for an earlier mid-sleep time — related
- Older adolescents show high night-to-night variability in free-living sleep duration, which may obscure sleep-cognition associations — related
- Adolescents with 7 hours or less total rest time show longer 3-back response times, both acutely and averaged over the week — reports the opposite
- Free-living sleep measures show no association with visual attention task performance in older adolescents — related
- Five nights of sleep restriction cause lower quiz performance in a simulated classroom among adolescents — related
- Shorter time in bed the night before testing is associated with slower 3-back response times in older adolescents — reports the opposite
- Sleep and consolidation support semantic memory development, suggesting delayed school start times may benefit memory — related
- Polysomnographic sleep parameters did not differ between afternoon- and evening-trained groups and did not correlate with memory consolidation measures — related
- Experimental sleep restriction causally extends adolescent sleep-loss effects beyond sleepiness to attention and learning — related
- A 30-minute rest and a full night's sleep each add small further gains in mental multiplication output, with accuracy unchanged — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
weekly-sleep-no-working-memory-association |
title |
Weekly average sleep measures show no association with working memory performance in older adolescents |
description |
Weekly average sleep measures show no association with working memory performance in older adolescents |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — stefansdottir-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.