Claims

Learners taught 40 figurative idioms via WhatsApp MMS messages scored significantly higher on the posttest than learners taught with traditional paper-based activities

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After a four-week treatment, the experimental group's posttest idiom scores were significantly higher than the control group's (independent-samples t-test, p = .001). → Ahmet Basal 2016

Evidence

Ahmet Basal 2016

Ahmet Basal, Selahattin Yilmaz, Asli Tanriverdi, & Lutfiye Sari. (2016). Effectiveness of Mobile Applications in Vocabulary Teaching. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(1), 47-59. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cet

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Between-groups comparison in a posttest-only two-group quasi-experiment with 50 first-year ELT students in Turkey (control n=25, experimental n=29 analyzed per Table 3). The independent-samples t-test on posttest scores gave t = -5.210, df = 52, p = .001, with means of 23.00 versus 31.55, showing the "experimental group achieved significantly bett er results o n the posttest".

"However, as seen in the table, the experimental group achieved significantly bett er results o n the posttest than the control group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.