Learning when to apply a skill benefits more from interleaved problem orders, while learning how to apply a skill benefits more from blocked problem orders¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The study provides theoretical support for the claim that learning when to apply a skill benefits more from interleaved problem orders, and the authors argue learning how to apply a skill benefits more from blocked problem orders. → Nan Li 2013
Evidence¶
Nan Li 2013¶
Nan Li, William W. Cohen, Kenneth R. Koedinger. (2013). Problem Order Implications for Learning. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-013-0005-5
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Authors' interpretive summary of the simulation study: negative feedback in interleaved orders serves as negative training examples for when-learning, while the article conjectures that with memory limitations, how-learning would benefit more from blocked orders because blocked sequences keep same-type positive examples within a fixed memory window.
"In summary, the study provides theoretical support for the claim that learning when to apply a skill benefits more from interleaved problem orders."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- SimStudent given interleaved-ordering curricula received more negative feedback in stoichiometry and fraction addition, supporting more effective when-learning — related
- In SimStudent simulations across three math and science domains, interleaved-order curricula yielded as effective or more effective learning than blocked-order curricula — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- In stoichiometry, SimStudent trained on interleaved-ordering curricula achieved significantly higher step scores than with blocked-ordering curricula — related
- Interleaving benefits low-skilled students more than high-skilled students when learning math problem categories — related
- Interleaving category examples improves inductive category learning for visual and mathematical materials, but not for expository texts or word categories — related
- Interleaved practice yields better category learning than blocked practice, and students who choose interleaved practice outperform those who choose blocked practice on novel materials — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
when-learning-interleaved-how-learning-blocked |
title |
Learning when to apply a skill benefits more from interleaved problem orders, while learning how to apply a skill benefits more from blocked problem orders |
description |
Learning when to apply a skill benefits more from interleaved problem orders, while learning how to apply a skill benefits more from blocked problem orders |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — nan-li-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.