Understandings of valued thinking have been dominated by the voices of White, predominantly male scholars¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims¶

q1 i? The article asserts that the voices of White, predominantly male scholars, past and present, have dominated understandings of valued thinking. → Murphy 2023

Evidence¶

Murphy 2023¶

Murphy, P. Karen, Ogata, Tyler, & Schoute, Eric C. (2023). “Valued” thinking in education: Liberating the narrative. Educational Psychology Review, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09754-0

q1 · i? · review · r2

This is the authors' stated aim and assertion in the abstract of the narrative review; the article offers no systematic evidence or analysis for it in the material presented. It is recorded as the authors' position, coded as a theoretical assertion with no printed effect size.

"we also hope to draw attention to the ways in which the voices of White, predominantly male scholars, past and present, have dominated understandings of valued thinking."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Minority teachers have lower observation scores than white teachers but no significant differences on value added — related
• Male teachers have lower observation and value-added scores than female teachers — related
• The review argues that the dominance of adaptive learning within AI integration undermines educational goals and limits student agency and creativity — related
• Male Chinese HSS students reported higher perceived GenAI gains in independent thinking, creativity and motivation, with minimal gender difference in performance — related