Claims

Most at-risk fourth graders apply whole-number logic when comparing decimals with different digit counts

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On a descriptive hidden decimal task, 86% of children identified 0.XXXX as greater than 0.X, consistent with whole number logic. → Malone Amelia S. 2017

Evidence

Malone Amelia S. 2017

Malone Amelia S., Loehr Abbey M., Fuchs Lynn S. (2017). The Role of Domain-General Cognitive Abilities and Decimal Labels in At-Risk Fourth-Grade Students' Decimal Magnitude Understanding. Learning and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.05.007

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Descriptive hidden decimal task (Resnick et al., 1989) administered for descriptive purposes only; only 14% answered correctly on the first item and 45% on the second item.

"Instead, 86% of children identified 0.XXXX as the greater decimal, which is consistent with whole number logic."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id whole-number-bias-hidden-decimal-task
title Most at-risk fourth graders apply whole-number logic when comparing decimals with different digit counts
description Most at-risk fourth graders apply whole-number logic when comparing decimals with different digit counts
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
recheck_by 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — malone-amelia-s-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.