Claims

Whole-task, metacognitive knowledge, and external standard interventions significantly improve monitoring accuracy in problem solving

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q4 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-21 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i1 Intervention types whole task (g = 0.38), metacognitive knowledge (g = 0.45), and external standard (g = 0.28) significantly improved students' monitoring accuracy in problem-solving tasks. → Noortje Janssen · Ard W. Lazonder 2024

Evidence

Noortje Janssen · Ard W. Lazonder 2024

Noortje Janssen · Ard W. Lazonder. (2024). Meta-analysis of Interventions for Monitoring Accuracy in Problem Solving. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09936-4

q4 · i1 · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis (Q-test) across the 35-study meta-analysis classified interventions into six types. Table 3 reports whole task k = 9, g = 0.38; metacognitive knowledge k = 3, g = 0.45; external standard k = 11, g = 0.28, each with confidence intervals excluding zero.

"The 95% confidence intervals indicate that the intervention types whole task, metacognitive knowledge, and external standards all significantly improved students’ monitoring accuracy."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id whole-task-metacognitive-knowledge-external-standard-interventions-improve-monitoring-accuracy
title Whole-task, metacognitive knowledge, and external standard interventions significantly improve monitoring accuracy in problem solving
description Whole-task, metacognitive knowledge, and external standard interventions significantly improve monitoring accuracy in problem solving
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
source_checked 2026-10-21
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — noortje-janssen-ard-w-lazonder-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.