Whole-task, metacognitive knowledge, and external standard interventions significantly improve monitoring accuracy in problem solving¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q4·i1small
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-21 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q4 i1 Intervention types whole task (g = 0.38), metacognitive knowledge (g = 0.45), and external standard (g = 0.28) significantly improved students' monitoring accuracy in problem-solving tasks. → Noortje Janssen · Ard W. Lazonder 2024
Evidence¶
Noortje Janssen · Ard W. Lazonder 2024¶
Noortje Janssen · Ard W. Lazonder. (2024). Meta-analysis of Interventions for Monitoring Accuracy in Problem Solving. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09936-4
q4 · i1 · quant-synthesis · r2
Moderator analysis (Q-test) across the 35-study meta-analysis classified interventions into six types. Table 3 reports whole task k = 9, g = 0.38; metacognitive knowledge k = 3, g = 0.45; external standard k = 11, g = 0.28, each with confidence intervals excluding zero.
"The 95% confidence intervals indicate that the intervention types whole task, metacognitive knowledge, and external standards all significantly improved students’ monitoring accuracy."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Metacognition — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Interventions to improve monitoring accuracy in problem-solving tasks have a small positive overall effect (g = 0.25) — a broader claim this one bears on
- Timing interventions significantly decrease monitoring accuracy in problem-solving tasks and differ from all other intervention types — reports the opposite
- Self-scoring improves primary students' monitoring accuracy on math problem-solving tasks to near-accurate levels — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
whole-task-metacognitive-knowledge-external-standard-interventions-improve-monitoring-accuracy |
title |
Whole-task, metacognitive knowledge, and external standard interventions significantly improve monitoring accuracy in problem solving |
description |
Whole-task, metacognitive knowledge, and external standard interventions significantly improve monitoring accuracy in problem solving |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
source_checked |
2026-10-21 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — noortje-janssen-ard-w-lazonder-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.