Claims

Low-level (Level III) learners performed significantly better under conventional lexical instruction than under corpus-based instruction with the Wikipedia Corpus.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Level III learners in the control group outperformed Level III learners in the experimental group, with a statistically significant difference favoring conventional instruction. → Shi 2015

Evidence

Shi 2015

Jing Shi. (2015). An Analysis of the Application of Wikipedia Corpus on the Lexical Learning in the Second Language Acquisition. English Language Teaching, 8(8). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n8p171

q2 · i? · causal · r1

In the same quasi-experiment of 48 Chinese English majors, the author reports that "learners in Level III in the control group did better than those in the experimental group, and the difference is statistically significant." No effect size is printed.

"Third, learners in Level III in the control group did better than those in the experimental group, and the difference is statistically significant. The new method does not function well in the low-level learners."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.