Males show a small but significant advantage on WISC crystallized intelligence (gC, d = 0.14), driven mainly by the Information subtest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr3·q3·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i0 The pooled gC effect significantly favours males (d = 0.14), roughly 2 IQ points, independent of WISC version. → D. Giofrè · K. Allen · E. Toffalini · S. Caviola 2022
q3 i0 The Information subtest shows the largest gC difference favouring males (d = 0.26), while Similarities is non-significant. → D. Giofrè · K. Allen · E. Toffalini · S. Caviola 2022 (2)
Evidence¶
D. Giofrè · K. Allen · E. Toffalini · S. Caviola 2022¶
D. Giofrè · K. Allen · E. Toffalini · S. Caviola. (2022). The Impasse on Gender Differences in Intelligence: a Meta-Analysis on WISC Batteries. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09705-1
q3 · i0 · quant-synthesis · r3
Meta-analysis of 41 studies (72 samples) for the gC factor; the standardization-sample estimate was virtually the same (d = 0.13), and the version moderator was not significant.
"The estimated mean effect size was significant but small, with higher scores in males than in females, d = 0.14 [0.08, 0.19], p < 0.001."
D. Giofrè · K. Allen · E. Toffalini · S. Caviola 2022 (2)¶
D. Giofrè · K. Allen · E. Toffalini · S. Caviola. (2022). The Impasse on Gender Differences in Intelligence: a Meta-Analysis on WISC Batteries. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09705-1
q3 · i0 · quant-synthesis · r3
Subtest-level meta-analysis (Table 2) of gC subtests; Vocabulary (d = 0.138) and Comprehension (d = 0.096) were small but significant, Similarities was not significant.
"a notable discrepancy emerged between Information, which presented the largest estimated difference in favour of males, d = 0.26 [0.17, 0.36], and the other subtests, which presented very small to negligible estimated effect sizes"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Cognitive subdomains differ in association strength with SiN perception, from r = .18 (crystallized IQ, nonsignificant) to r = .39 (processing speed) — related
- Gender differences on WISC subtests and factors are generally smaller or unchanged with newer WISC versions, never larger — related
- Females outperform males on WISC processing speed (gS) with a medium advantage (d = -0.37), larger for Coding than Symbol search — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
wisc-crystallized-intelligence-male-advantage |
title |
Males show a small but significant advantage on WISC crystallized intelligence (gC, d = 0.14), driven mainly by the Information subtest |
description |
Males show a small but significant advantage on WISC crystallized intelligence (gC, d = 0.14), driven mainly by the Information subtest |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — d-giofrè-k-allen-e-toffalini-s-caviola-2022, d-giofrè-k-allen-e-toffalini-s-caviola-2022-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.