Claims

Gender differences on WISC working memory (gSM) are negligible and not statistically significant

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The pooled gSM effect was near zero (d = -0.04) and not statistically significant (p = 0.09), despite a hypothesized female advantage. → D. Giofrè · K. Allen · E. Toffalini · S. Caviola 2022

Evidence

D. Giofrè · K. Allen · E. Toffalini · S. Caviola 2022

D. Giofrè · K. Allen · E. Toffalini · S. Caviola. (2022). The Impasse on Gender Differences in Intelligence: a Meta-Analysis on WISC Batteries. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09705-1

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 28 studies (48 samples) for the gSM factor; the standardization-sample estimate was the same (d = -0.04), and neither battery version nor mean age was a significant moderator. Equivalence was not tested.

"The estimated mean effect size was near zero, d = -0.04 [-0.09, 0.01], p = 0.09."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id wisc-working-memory-no-gender-difference
title Gender differences on WISC working memory (gSM) are negligible and not statistically significant
description Gender differences on WISC working memory (gSM) are negligible and not statistically significant
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — d-giofrè-k-allen-e-toffalini-s-caviola-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.