Within-person deviations from math and self-efficacy growth trajectories at a given time point are not related across constructs¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Within-person deviations from growth trajectories at a given point in time do not appear related across the math and self-efficacy constructs. → James Soland 2019
Evidence¶
James Soland 2019¶
James Soland. (2019). Modeling academic achievement and self-efficacy as joint developmental processes: Evidence for education, counseling, and policy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 65, 101076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101076
q3 · i? · associational · r?
Joint latent curve models fitted to repeated measures of math achievement and self-efficacy examined how the constructs relate within persons. The article reports that within-person deviations "do not appear related across constructs"; no effect size is printed in the available text.
"Results indicate that, while there is a significant association between growth in self-efficacy and growth in math, within-person deviations from those growth trajectories at a given point in time do not appear related across constructs."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Prior longitudinal studies of math and self-efficacy tend to fit models assuming the constructs lack unique developmental trajectories and do not examine within-person relations — related
- Growth in academic self-efficacy is significantly associated with growth in mathematics achievement when modeled jointly — related
- Fifth-grade self-efficacy is associated with later math and reading growth (.15 and .19 standardized units per SD), mediating ELL status's indirect negative association with growth — related
- ELLs start middle school roughly .6 SD lower in math and .65 SD lower in reading, with faster reading growth (.13 SD) but no significantly faster math or self-efficacy growth — related
- The rank ordering of math and reading skills is highly stable over time, while four SEL domains are more strongly influenced by contextual factors — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
within-person-deviations-unrelated-across-constructs |
title |
Within-person deviations from math and self-efficacy growth trajectories at a given time point are not related across constructs |
description |
Within-person deviations from math and self-efficacy growth trajectories at a given time point are not related across constructs |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — james-soland-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.