Claims

Within-person changes in response time have inconsistent implications for accuracy, predicting higher accuracy in some cases and declines in others

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Idiosyncratic within-person changes in response time have inconsistent implications for accuracy: additional response time predicts higher accuracy in some cases and declines in accuracy in others. → Domingue 2021

Evidence

Domingue 2021

Domingue, B., Kanopka, K., Staug, B., Soland, J., Kuhfeld, M., Wise, S., & Piech, C. (2021). Variation in respondent speed and its implications: Evidence from an adaptive testing scenario. Journal of Educational Measurement, 58(3), 335-363. doi:10.1111/jedm.12291

q2 · i? · associational · r?

The second behavior identified in the MAP Growth adaptive testing data is within-person variation in the association between time usage and accuracy; the article reports the association is "inconsistent," with additional time predicting higher accuracy in some cases and declines in others.

"Idiosyncratic within-person changes in response time have inconsistent implications for accuracy; in some cases additional response time predicts higher accuracy but in other cases additional response time predicts declines in accuracy."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id within-person-time-accuracy-association-varies
title Within-person changes in response time have inconsistent implications for accuracy, predicting higher accuracy in some cases and declines in others
description Within-person changes in response time have inconsistent implications for accuracy, predicting higher accuracy in some cases and declines in others
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — domingue-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.