Working memory shows a moderate average correlation with mathematics (r = 0.35), stronger for calculation and problem solving than geometry, per a meta-analysis of 110 studies cited in the article¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The article reports, citing Peng et al. (2015), a meta-analysis of 110 studies finding an average WM–mathematics correlation of r = 0.35, with stronger associations for calculation and problem solving than geometry. → Mercader J 2018
Evidence¶
Mercader J 2018¶
Mercader J, Miranda A, Presentación MJ, Siegenthaler R and Rosel JF (2018) Contributions of Motivation, Early Numeracy Skills, and Executive Functioning to Mathematical Performance. A Longitudinal Study. Front. Psychol. 8:2375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02375
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Background-literature report: the article attributes this meta-analytic finding to Peng et al. (2015), noting associations were higher in children with mathematical difficulties and other unrelated disorders, and that "WM had a stronger association with calculation and problem solving, but not with geometry."
"A recent meta-analysis by Peng et al. (2015) included 110 studies that contributed to supporting the relation between working memory (WM) and mathematics. The data showed a correlation average of r = 0.35, which was similar in the different WM domains analyzed"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Executive functions and working memory correlate moderately to strongly with mathematics achievement (r = .28 to .40), from preschool through elementary school — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
wm-math-correlation-r-035-meta-analysis |
title |
Working memory shows a moderate average correlation with mathematics (r = 0.35), stronger for calculation and problem solving than geometry, per a meta-analysis of 110 studies cited in the article |
description |
Working memory shows a moderate average correlation with mathematics (r = 0.35), stronger for calculation and problem solving than geometry, per a meta-analysis of 110 studies cited in the article |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mercader-j-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.