In e-learning text comprehension, higher working memory and lower self-reported navigation behavior predict better comprehension¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In a generalized linear regression on comprehension of e-learning science texts (n = 125), working memory (B = 0.214, p = .016) and Navigation (B = −0.345, p = .038) were the only significant predictors. → Burin 2018
Evidence¶
Burin 2018¶
Burin, D. I., Irrazabal, N., Injoque Ricle, I., Saux, G., & Barreyro, J. P. (2018). Self-reported internet skills, previous knowledge and working memory in text comprehension in E-learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0099-9
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Study 2 generalized linear regression (normal distribution, identity link) predicting z-scored comprehension total in 125 college students who read high- and low-knowledge expository texts in a Moodle course accessed remotely. The overall model was significant, "Likelihood ratio test χ2 (8) = 17.04, p = .03"; higher WM and lower Navigation scores were associated with better comprehension.
"Only WM, B = 0.214, 95% CI = [0.012, 0.415], Wald (1) = 4.321, p = .016, and Navigation, B = − 0.345, 95% CI =[ − 0.625, − 0.064], Wald (1) = 5.795, p = .038, contributed significantly to comprehension."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Previous domain knowledge did not affect e-learning text comprehension, directly or as a moderator — related
- Language comprehension and numerical working memory predict comparing decimals to the one-half benchmark — related
- Working memory capacity moderated disfluency effects in one study but not another — related
- Working memory capacity predicts comprehension performance only in the disfluency condition, with higher WMC yielding better comprehension — related
- Working memory capacity predicts retention performance only in the disfluency condition, with higher WMC yielding better retention — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
wm-positive-navigation-negative-elearning-comprehension |
title |
In e-learning text comprehension, higher working memory and lower self-reported navigation behavior predict better comprehension |
description |
In e-learning text comprehension, higher working memory and lower self-reported navigation behavior predict better comprehension |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — burin-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.