Intervention effect sizes are moderated by treatment length, subword-level criterion variables, and speeded tests¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Effect sizes of computer-assisted word reading interventions were moderated by treatment length, subword level as criterion variable, and speeded tests. → Verhoeven 2022

Evidence¶

Verhoeven 2022¶

Verhoeven, L.T.W.; Voeten, M.J.M.; Segers, P.C.J. (2022). Computer-assisted word reading intervention effects throughout the primary grades: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 37, article 100486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100486

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analyses within the multilevel meta-analysis of 67 intervention studies; the review reports that effect sizes "were moderated by treatment length, subword level as criterion variable and speeded tests". No moderator effect sizes are printed in the available text.

"The effect sizes were moderated by treatment length, subword level as criterion variable and speeded tests."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Computer-assisted word reading interventions yield an average effect size of 0.36 on word reading outcomes across program types and languages in primary grades — related
• Effect sizes are higher against education-as-usual controls and lower against reading-treatment control conditions — related