Claims

The learning benefit of the worked-example textbook was greater for students with lower pretest proportional reasoning skills

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A significant negative treatment × pretest proportional reasoning interaction indicated treatment students with poorer pretest proportional reasoning benefited more, gaining more probabilistic reasoning at posttest. → Begolli 2021

Evidence

Begolli 2021

Begolli, K. N., Dai, T., McGinn, K. M., & Booth, J. L. (2021). Could probability be out of proportion? Self-explanation and example-based practice help students with lower proportional reasoning skills learn probability. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09550-9

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Regression interaction from the same cluster-randomized classroom experiment (Model 4, N = 220). The printed coefficient was "bTreatment x PR Pretest = − 0.34, SE = 0.15, t = − 2.34, p = 0.044", plotted in Fig. 4 with 95% confidence interval bars.

"the significant interaction between treatment and pretest Proportional Reasoning scores (bTreatment x PR Pretest = − 0.34, SE = 0.15, t = − 2.34, p = 0.044) had a small negative influence on posttest Probabilistic Reasoning scores, indicating that the treatment participants with poorer pretest Proportional Reasoning scores actually benefited more from the treatment"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id worked-examples-benefit-lower-proportional-reasoners
title The learning benefit of the worked-example textbook was greater for students with lower pretest proportional reasoning skills
description The learning benefit of the worked-example textbook was greater for students with lower pretest proportional reasoning skills
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — begolli-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.