Claims

Higher working memory capacity was associated with better final test performance on advanced materials

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The direct path from working memory to final test performance was positive and significant in the mediation model. → Redifer 2026

Evidence

Redifer 2026

Redifer, J. L., Myers, S. J., Bae, C. L., Naas, A., & Scott, A. (2026). Testing the testing effect with advanced materials while accounting for individual differences. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09758-z

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Mediation analysis covariate path in the 213-participant experiment; working memory was measured via automated Symmetry Span and Operation Span tasks one week after learning. The path was "positive and significant" with B = 0.547; no standardized effect size was printed.

"the direct path from working memory to final test perfor­mance was positive and significant, B = 0.547, 95% CI [0.11, 0.98], p =.01, SE = 0.22"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id working-memory-predicts-advanced-material-test-performance
title Higher working memory capacity was associated with better final test performance on advanced materials
description Higher working memory capacity was associated with better final test performance on advanced materials
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — redifer-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.