An international expert workshop gap analysis identified five dimensions of gaps impeding integration of research evidence into classroom practice¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Thematic analysis of a two-day workshop involving five heads of research labs from the UK, France, and Chile identified gaps in five areas: existing theory and knowledge, the research-practice divide, research methodologies, empirical testing and evidence verification, and research with specific populations. → Bowen 2025

Evidence¶

Bowen 2025¶

Bowen, A. E. J., Ferreira, R. A., Tolmie, A., Thomas, M. S. C., Borst, G. & Van Herwegen, J. (2025). International perspectives on gaps and solutions for integrating research evidence into classroom practices. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00370-x

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Qualitative gap analysis of presentation slides and notes from a two-day workshop with five heads of science of learning labs from three countries, thematically analysed using an adapted Miles framework. The analysis "Gaps were identified in relation to" five dimensions and reported consensus that the challenges are shared internationally.

"Gaps were identified in relation to: (1) existing theory and knowledge; (2) the research-practice divide; (3) research methodologies; (4) empirical testing and evidence verification; and (5) research with specific populations."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• AI integration in online learning raises interconnected challenges of academic integrity, equity and bias, ethics and privacy, and institutional policy gaps — related
• International faculty feedback revealed that the term service is not clearly recognized outside North America, prompting wording changes for global comprehensibility — related