Written presentation of objectives and direct instruction are instructional activities linked to stronger effects of ICT-supported writing interventions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Presentation of objectives in written form significantly moderated effects (b = 0.815, p = .049). → López 2026
q3 i? Direct instruction significantly moderated effects (b = 0.516, p = .049). → López 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
López 2026¶
López, P., Fidalgo, R., Álvarez-Moreno, C., Díaz-Tejedor, R., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2026). Compositional Analysis of Writing Instructional Practices Performed with Digital Tools: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10153-4
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
One-by-one meta-regression moderator analysis across 53 effect sizes found written presentation of objectives significant. The unstandardized coefficient was "b = 0.815" with p = .049; the feature was present in 14 of 53 effects.
"presentation of objectives/instructions in written form as a separate activity (present 14 out of 53): Fm(1, 11.624) = 4.782, p = .049; b = 0.815, 95% CI [> 0,009 1.631])"
López 2026 (2)¶
López, P., Fidalgo, R., Álvarez-Moreno, C., Díaz-Tejedor, R., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2026). Compositional Analysis of Writing Instructional Practices Performed with Digital Tools: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10153-4
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
In the same one-by-one meta-regressions, direct instruction significantly moderated effects with the unstandardized coefficient "b = 0.516" and p = .049, present in 48 of 53 effect sizes.
"direct instruction (present 48 out of 53): Fm(1, 5.116) = 6.563, p = .049; b = 0.516, 95% CI [0.002, 1.03])."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Writing Skills — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
Related Claims¶
- Contextual variables (educational level, language context, study design, duration, intensity) do not significantly moderate the effects of ICT-supported writing interventions — related
- Merrill's instructional design principles and feedback features did not significantly moderate the effects of ICT-supported writing interventions — related
- Dynamic (adaptive) scaffolding is linked to stronger effects of ICT-supported writing interventions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
written-objectives-direct-instruction-moderate-effects |
title |
Written presentation of objectives and direct instruction are instructional activities linked to stronger effects of ICT-supported writing interventions |
description |
Written presentation of objectives and direct instruction are instructional activities linked to stronger effects of ICT-supported writing interventions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — lópez-2026, lópez-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.