Positive feedback from experienced surgeons during XR-based surgical training enhances learning (social influence)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? From a social influence standpoint, XR technologies enhanced learning by providing positive feedback from experienced surgeons during surgical training. → Esmaeel T 2024
Evidence¶
Esmaeel T 2024¶
Esmaeel T, Elham T, Fereidooni Mahsa, Ayatollahi Haleh. (2024). Acceptance and use of extended reality in surgical training: an umbrella review. Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02723-w
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Descriptive UTAUT synthesis of the included reviews. The review reports that XR "enhanced learning by providing positive feedback from experienced surgeons during surgical training"; no effect sizes are printed.
"From a social influence standpoint, XR technologies enhanced learning by providing positive feedback from experienced surgeons during surgical training."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- XR technologies improve surgical skills and procedural accuracy while reducing risks and operating room time (performance expectancy) — related
- XR-enriched simulations were the most prevalent technology in the reviewed studies (37%, n=65), with reported effectiveness in surgical, anatomical, and procedural skills development — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.