Claims

Year 3 medical students achieved significantly better exam scores than year 1 students in both integrated cardiovascular and respiratory courses

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Year 3 participants scored significantly higher than year 1 participants on the integrated cardiovascular course exam (p<0.05). → Pan et al. 2017 q2 i? Year 3 participants scored significantly higher than year 1 participants on the integrated respiratory course exam (p<0.01). → Pan et al. 2017

Evidence

Pan et al. 2017

Sanqiang Pan, Xin Cheng, Yanghai Zhou, Ke Li & Xuesong Yang. (2017). Seeking the Optimal Time for Integrated Curriculum in Jinan University School of Medicine. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n1p25

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental comparison of elective integrated-course final exams (a six-question clinical case analysis) taken by year 1 and year 3 volunteers in summer 2012. The article reports "year 3 students are significantly better than the ones from year 1 students" in both subjects, with the printed means and p-values above.

"the exam scores from year 3 students are significantly better than the ones from year 1 students in both subjects of cardiovascular (year 3 = 78.59 ± 0.34, n=25; year 1 = 74.15 ± 9.71, n = 17; p<0.05) and respiratory systems (year 3 = 77.43 ± 6.89, n=25; year 1 = 65.87 ± 14.52, n = 26; p<0.01)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.