Claims

Young EFL learners report positive attitudes toward grammar consciousness-raising, viewing it as useful and age-appropriate

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? At least 50% of experimental-group participants agreed or strongly agreed with all questionnaire statements, and 80% considered the technique useful for grammar development. → Hamidreza Fatemipour & Shiva Hemmati 2015

Evidence

Hamidreza Fatemipour & Shiva Hemmati 2015

Hamidreza Fatemipour & Shiva Hemmati. (2015). Impact of Consciousness-Raising Activities on Young English Language Learners’ Grammar Performance. English Language Teaching, 8(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n9p1

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Twenty-item five-point Likert questionnaire administered to the experimental group (Cronbach's alpha = .87 across 20 items). The article reports 80% agreement on item 5 (usefulness for grammar scores) and more than 83% on item 16 (cheery, active class atmosphere).

"As Table 8 shows, at least 50% of the participants strongly agreed or agree with all the statements. It shows that the learners had positive attitudes toward the consciousness-raising technique."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.