Claims

EFL students who watched YouTube clips during reading activities scored significantly higher on a vocabulary post-test than students not exposed to the videos

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group's post-test scores (M=46.5, SD=8.6) were significantly higher than the control group's (M=31.3, SD=9.2), t(98)=7.515, p<0.05. → Kabooha and Elyas 2018

Evidence

Kabooha and Elyas 2018

Raniah Kabooha & Tariq Elyas. (2018). The Effects of YouTube in Multimedia Instruction for Vocabulary Learning: Perceptions of EFL Students and Teachers. English Language Teaching, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n2p72

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Independent-sample t-test comparing post-test scores of the experimental group (75 students who watched YouTube) and control group (25 students) after a seven-week module. The article reports the experimental group 'were significantly higher' with t(98)=7.515, p<0.05; no effect size is printed.

"the post-test scores of the students in the experimental group (M= 46.5, SD= 8.6) were significantly higher ( t (98) = 7.515, p< 0.05) when compared to the scores of the students in the control group (M= 31.3, SD= 9.2)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.