Use audience-perception associations to set design priorities for digital lacquer-painting experiences, pending evaluation with real interfaces¶

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited

Description¶

The article proposes audience-informed design priorities rather than evidence of technological effectiveness: because perceived immersive affordance tracked sensible scene, "museums could prioritize testable prototypes involving controllable viewpoints, close-up access, and clear presentation of material layers"; interactive affordance suggests narrative exploration and participatory interpretation as user-testing candidates; distributed affordance suggests transparent explanation of provenance, authorized sharing, and derivative participation. For educators, it suggests testing lesson designs that pair perceptual attention with contextual interpretation.

Design Implications¶

Context¶

Requirements¶

• Each proposal requires evaluation with actual interfaces and behavioral outcomes before implementation claims can be made

Constraints¶

• The findings identify expectations that may guide prototype development but do not show that VR simulations, parametric graphics, gesture recognition, or other devices improve learning or aesthetic response; estimates apply most to engaged online audiences

Target Learners¶

• museum audiences
• art students
• digital-art community members

Target Learning Goals¶

• aesthetic perception of lacquer painting
• cultural and interpretive understanding
• participation in heritage activities

Affordances¶

• Technology Imagery Perception Model

Related Strategies¶

• Investigate technology's role in community-based lifelong learning delivery as a research priority

Examples¶

-

Key Sources¶

• Liu Yuanyuan. (2026). Audience attitudes and aesthetic perception of digitally empowered contemporary lacquer painting: a survey-based technology-imagery-perception model. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1866076