Strategies

Replace controlling language with relevance demonstrations and opportunities for pupil opinion

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 4 claims (4 for) · 1 study (1 associational), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 4 claims rest on one study

Description

A concrete classroom alternative to psychological control drawn from the article's applied discussion: rather than compelling pupils, teachers should show why activities matter and invite pupil voice. The article advises that "Teachers should not force pupils to do activities, but demonstrate the relevance of learning activities, and provide the opportunity for pupils to give their opinion without using controlling language". It names phrases such as "you must" or "have to" as controlling language to avoid.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Goals

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type strategy
id autonomy-supportive-language-alternatives
title Replace controlling language with relevance demonstrations and opportunities for pupil opinion
description A concrete classroom alternative to psychological control drawn from the article's applied discussion: rather than compelling pupils, teachers should show why activities matter and invite pupil voice.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — stephen-r-earl-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.