Multi-pronged policy strategy for COVID-19 learning recovery for BIPOC students¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 2 claims (2 mixed) · 1 study (1 associational),q2· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study
Description¶
The report offers a set of policy recommendations meant to encompass a wide range of supports: improving remote learning (broadband, devices, technical support, family communication, teacher professional development), extending learning time (summer enrichment, early school start, extended days, high-quality tutoring tied to school curriculum), targeting federal resources equitably to districts and schools with higher concentrations of BIPOC and low-income students, and addressing academic, social, and emotional needs through regular assessment, mental health screening and counseling, and expanded school meal programs.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Recommendations assume policymakers can direct federal resources and that districts can coordinate with community-based organizations with a proven track record of serving BIPOC communities
Constraints¶
- The report states data should not be used to underinvest: in some places data has been used to underinvest when it should be used to target more resources
Target Learners¶
- BIPOC students in grades 3-8, particularly Black, Latinx, AIAN, and Native Hawaiian students in high-poverty schools
Target Learning Goals¶
- Recovery of math and reading achievement and growth toward and beyond pre-pandemic rates of learning
Claims¶
- High-poverty schools were overrepresented among New York charter schools that had not provided devices to students before building closure (86.8% of non-providers vs 79.3% of the sample) [~W]
- Just under half of New York charter schools (45.8%) reported no challenges supporting ELL/MLL students remotely; high-poverty schools were more likely to report challenges [~W]
Related Strategies¶
- Use summer learning loss research to help educators, policy makers, and families plan for and address impacts of extended school closures
- When planning for the school year during COVID-19, schools and districts should weigh public health factors alongside educational factors such as potential learning loss
- Use federal ESSER and IDEA funding to provide early intervention, extended school year support in the summer, and other evidence-based supports for students with disabilities
- Deploy federal recovery funding to support recovery, accelerate learning, and transform schools
- Design summer programs with purposeful curriculum, stable staff, and cultural relevance, sustained over multiple summers
- Federal policy should fund wraparound supports and community schools integrating health, mental health, social services, and extended learning time
- Policy implications: multi-factor, asset-based support for low-SES students
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Megan Kuhfeld, Erik Ruzek, Karyn Lewis, Jim Soland, Angela Johnson, Beth Tarasawa, & Lindsay Dworkin. (2021). Understanding the initial educational impacts of COVID-19 on communities of color. NWEA Research Report. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/understanding-the-initial-educational-impacts-of-covid-19-on-communities-of-color/
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
covid-recovery-policy-strategy-bipoc-students |
title |
Multi-pronged policy strategy for COVID-19 learning recovery for BIPOC students |
description |
The report offers a set of policy recommendations meant to encompass a wide range of supports: improving remote learning (broadband, devices, technical support, family communication, teacher professional development),... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — megan-kuhfeld-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.