Treat debriefing models as designable curricular artefacts that coordinate remembering, analysis, and planning¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited
Description¶
The editorial highlights Solberg and Sellberg's notion of epistemic engineering, in which facilitators balance structure with responsiveness so that remembering is joint, analysis distributed, and takeaways actionable. It proposes that "debriefing models themselves should be treated as designable curricular artefacts that coordinate remembering, analysis, and planning". Facilitators use models and artefacts to reconstrue performance into teachable knowledge.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Facilitators need pedagogical competence to engineer the epistemic environment, balancing structure with responsiveness
Constraints¶
Target Learners¶
- professional education learners, e.g., nursing students and healthcare teams
Target Learning Goals¶
- joint remembering, distributed metacognition, and actionable takeaways from simulation
Related Strategies¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Charlott Sellberg & Oskar Lindwall. (2025). Simulation-based training in professional education: learning, participation, and instructional design. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09763-2
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
debriefing-as-epistemic-engineering-strategy |
title |
Treat debriefing models as designable curricular artefacts that coordinate remembering, analysis, and planning |
description |
The editorial highlights Solberg and Sellberg's notion of epistemic engineering, in which facilitators balance structure with responsiveness so that remembering is joint, analysis distributed, and takeaways actionable. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — charlott-sellberg-oskar-lindwall-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.