Require students engaging GenAI for feedback to declare the feedback received and how they refined their work in response¶

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited

Description¶

The article's first recommendation from the case study: when students use GenAI for feedback, they should document the feedback and their response to it. It states: "If students engage with GenAI for feedback, they should highlight the feedback and how they may or may not have refined their work in response to it." This lets educators understand students' acceptance of GenAI-generated information, provides first steps toward increasing feedback literacy, and helps interpret students' evaluative judgements of GenAI use.

Design Implications¶

Context¶

Requirements¶

• A declaration or disclosure mechanism attached to assessment submission

Constraints¶

• The educational value of GenAI feedback depends on whether students question and evaluate the output; a correctness check can be shallow

Target Learners¶

• undergraduate students using GenAI in assessment

Target Learning Goals¶

• feedback literacy
• evaluative judgement of GenAI outputs

Related Strategies¶

• Evaluate GenAI declaration frameworks empirically and pair them with institutional guidance on which tools are in scope

Examples¶

-

Key Sources¶

• Zachery Quince and Emily Faulconer. (2026). Student GenAI use under changing institutional policies: a mixed-methods case study in undergraduate physics. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-026-00651-w