Build L1 commands for survey and learning tactics into delivery system software, with an L2 advisor when strategy is involved¶

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited

Description¶

The report recommends that delivery system software contain functions at the L0 level of discourse at minimum, but argues that interaction is highly restrictive unless L1 commands are available, at least for survey tactics and learning tactics. When L1 commands are available, or when strategy is involved as in a game or simulation, an L2 advisor is described as extremely desirable. These functions must be built into the delivery system software and can be activated by either author or student.

Design Implications¶

Context¶

Requirements¶

• L0-level delivery functions must exist first, since L2 and L1 functions are built upon them

Constraints¶

• Natural responses such as vocal or gesture input were beyond the state of the art, so students must agree to a restricted language

Target Learners¶

• Army soldiers using interactive videodisc training systems

Target Learning Goals¶

• Learner control over browsing, sequencing of learning tactics, and strategy adjustment

Affordances¶

• Levels Of Discourse L0 L1 L2

Related Strategies¶

Examples¶

-

Key Sources¶

• Bunderson, C. Victor; Campbell, J. Olin; Farr, Beatrice J. (1980). Instructional Systems Development Model for Interactive Videodisc Training Delivery Systems. Volume I: Hardware, Software and Procedures. Army Research Institute Technical Report 511. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED220071