Strategies

Teach students to distinguish durable principles from contingent capabilities to keep their model of the field current

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited

Description

The closing module's strategy for future-proofing the discipline is an explicit inventory of which taught principles are likely durable and which are tied to current capabilities. The durable list includes "co-evolution, intent discipline, verification before trust, human accountability, the audit trail and framing as the first design decision," while the contingent list includes specific ADE features, current cost structures, today's failure-mode taxonomy, current context window sizes and current orchestration patterns. Students learn to read the boundary between the two lists and to update their model of the field as model releases, ADE evolution and regulatory developments arrive; the closing assessment artefact carries this meta-skill into grading.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Goals

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type strategy
id durable-principles-versus-contingent-capabilities
title Teach students to distinguish durable principles from contingent capabilities to keep their model of the field current
description The closing module's strategy for future-proofing the discipline is an explicit inventory of which taught principles are likely durable and which are tied to current capabilities.
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — mikael-gorsky-holon-institute-of-technology-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.